[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the case of point #3 that you're making here, are you saying that
the AGPLv3 fails the dissident test?
Yes, I'm saying that it might be failing it. If you use a program
Not that this matters, since this test is not part of the DFSG.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To
2008/8/27 Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the case of point #3 that you're making here, are you saying that
the AGPLv3 fails the dissident test?
Yes, I'm saying that it might be failing it. If you use a program
Not that this matters, since this test is not part of
Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/27 Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the case of point #3 that you're making here, are you saying that
the AGPLv3 fails the dissident test?
Yes, I'm saying that it might be failing it. If you use a program
Not that
2008/8/27 MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/27 Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the case of point #3 that you're making here, are you saying that
the AGPLv3 fails the dissident test?
Yes, I'm saying that it might be failing
Miriam Ruiz writes (Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?):
Do you think AGPLv3 is DFSG-free?
Yes. The source-transmission requirement is hardly onerous, and there
is an important class of sitations where that extra restriction is
very important to stop someone making the code effectively
proprietary.
Ian.
Miriam Ruiz writes (Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?):
2008/8/19 Arc Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If, however, you're using AGPLv3 software on your phone that allows other
phone owners to play with you over bluetooth/wifi/etc without them needing
to download a copy of the game from you, then you're
Miriam Ruiz writes (Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?):
2008/8/25 Arc Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I respectfully request that PySoy not be packaged in Debian if the AGPLv3 is
confirmed as non-free in the eyes of your project, as this would be
considered by our project as false advertising in grouping
To be honest, I just don't want our project to be in the middle of this
given the situation;
- we're in 1.0-beta* phase right now receiving community input on the API
as we build toward 1.0
- our last beta release was January 1st 2008, licensed under the GPLv3,
so it can't be used to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miriam Ruiz writes (Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?):
Do you think AGPLv3 is DFSG-free?
Yes. The source-transmission requirement is hardly onerous, and there
is an important class of sitations where that extra restriction is
very important to stop someone making the code
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the case of point #3 that you're making here, are you saying that
the AGPLv3 fails the dissident test?
Yes, I'm saying that it might be failing it. If you use a program
Not that this matters, since this test is not part of the DFSG.
It's an old discussion. It may
Arc Riley writes (Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?):
To be honest, I just don't want our project to be in the middle of this
given the situation;
[stuff]
I've been told that other AGPLv3 licensed projects in a greater state of
stability are in the pipeline toward ftpmasters, which will set
11 matches
Mail list logo
