I hope no-one minds, but I'd like some smart analysis of this software's
licence, so I'm asking debian-legal for their views.
Please keep the Cc to the ITP report on replies.
juanro...@gmail.com wrote:
* Package name: s3sync-ruby
* URL : http://s3sync.net/
* License :
Please, also see the licence for the file
http://code.google.com/p/s3sync-s3cmd/source/browse/trunk/s3sync/S3.rb
# This software code is made available AS IS without warranties of any
# kind. You may copy, display, modify and redistribute the software
# code either by itself or as
Hello,
The current released version (2.4.x) series under an interpretation that
OpenSSL is not a system library routine, which is Debian's position, means
that they cannot distribute Bacula with OpenSSL enabled (Bacula
communications and data encryption).
The source code does exist, but is
* Matthew Johnson:
On Fri Jan 02 19:50, Mike Hommey wrote:
As the GPL and CDDL are incompatible, as GPL code has some strange
interactions with other code (library linkage, etc.), and as I'm not
sure how sourced bash scripts are supposed to be considered in this
context, I wonder if having
In message 87sknziao6@mid.deneb.enyo.de, Florian Weimer
f...@deneb.enyo.de writes
* Matthew Johnson:
On Fri Jan 02 19:50, Mike Hommey wrote:
As the GPL and CDDL are incompatible, as GPL code has some strange
interactions with other code (library linkage, etc.), and as I'm not
sure how
5 matches
Mail list logo
