Re: BSD license with Mozilla-style name clause

2009-01-08 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:43:41 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 07 janvier 2009 à 23:19 +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit : > > > I think it would also be enough to obtain a permission from the authors > > > to call Debian modified versions "Alice", as long as renaming it is easy > > > otherw

Re: enabling transport and on storage encryption in bacula on debian build

2009-01-08 Thread Hendrik Weimer
Kern Sibbald writes: > I personally don't believe that such distribution is a problem -- > after all Debian does distribute pure GPLv2 code and OpenSSL source > code on the same ISO image. This should not be a problem anyway as it falls under the "mere aggregation" clause. > Problems of mismatc

Re: enabling transport and on storage encryption in bacula on debian build

2009-01-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
Ken Arromdee wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Kern Sibbald wrote: > 1. Build it from source yourself (perfectly legal -- only distribution > violates the GPL license). >>> Isn't it the FSF's position that "user does the link" violates GPL? >> No. Please read the GPL. > > I suggest you Google u

Re: BSD license with Mozilla-style name clause

2009-01-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 07 janvier 2009 à 23:19 +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit : > > I think it would also be enough to obtain a permission from the authors > > to call Debian modified versions "Alice", as long as renaming it is easy > > otherwise. We have allowed such things in the past. > > I don't think the