On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:25:51 +
"Anthony W. Youngman" wrote:
> In message <20090121115624.27b9b...@glh-hp-dv2940se>, Greg Harris
> writes
> >On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:14:37 -0800
> >Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> No, he's saying that if you *commit a tort against someone located
> >> in U
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:25:51PM +, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> At the end of the day, what I do, I do it IN ENGLAND,
No, you don't. When you post to this mailing list, you are deliberately
engaged in an act that crosses national boundaries (both your interlocutors
in this discussion, and
In message <20090121115624.27b9b...@glh-hp-dv2940se>, Greg Harris
writes
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:14:37 -0800
Steve Langasek wrote:
No, he's saying that if you *commit a tort against someone located in
Utah*, you are subject to Utah state law. If you've committed a tort
against someone locate
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:14:37 -0800
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:45:23PM +, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> >>> But surely, in order to do so, you must have broken a Federal
> >>> statute? Not knowing the American legal system, I find it very
> >>> odd that you could be sued
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:45:23PM +, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>>> But surely, in order to do so, you must have broken a Federal statute?
>>> Not knowing the American legal system, I find it very odd that you could
>>> be sued in Utah, or in California under Utah law, if you've never been
>>>
"Anthony W. Youngman" writes:
> Dry Roast Peanuts
> Caution! This product may contain nuts!
This warning isn't as silly as it sounds: peanuts are legumes rather
than nuts, so if you're allergic to nuts you may still be able to eat
peanuts provided they've not been mixed with other nuts during
pr
In message <200901201403.48978.skell...@gmail.com>, Sean Kellogg
writes
On Tuesday 20 January 2009 12:49:28 pm Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
No it's not a problem at all. What IS the problem is that you are
telling me I should abide by American law, when I am not American, have
only ever ONCE set
"Bernhard R. Link" writes:
> If this is the case, then I guess we have quite an big problem, as I
> guess such code and especially data is to be found in quite a large
> amount of places.
Actually, I don't think that's much of an issue. Software seems to be
mostly unaffected as US government ent
8 matches
Mail list logo
