Hi All;
I'm wondering about the DFSGness of arprec
(http://crd.lbl.gov/~dhbailey/mpdist/)
Copying says this:
,
| This work was supported by the Director, Office of Science, Division
| of Mathematical, Information, and Computational Sciences of the
| U.S. Department of Energy under contract
Matthijs Kooijman writes:
> It should be evident that this issue should (and will) be fixed in the
> next package upload. However, these issues will then still be present
> in previous versions. Considering that they are licensing issues,
> should I take extra effort to get a new version into len
On 16.08.2009 10:50, Luk Claes wrote:
Matthias Klose wrote:
On 29.04.2009 04:49, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Florian Weimer:
I've asked the FSF for a clarification (the second time, the first
clarification resulted in the Java bytecode exception). Until we know
for sure how to interpret the exce
Hi all,
I've just discovered an error in the copyright file of a package I maintaine
(openttd). The copyright file says it is distributed under GPL, version 2 or
above, while upstream only distributes under GPL version 2. This issue has
been present since around 2006 and affects versions in stable
4 matches
Mail list logo