Re: question about Good/Evil in a license

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:34:01PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 20.09.2009, 01:10 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: > > Trivially non-free (DFSG #6). Also, the word "evil" is far too > > subjective to be meaningful in a license. > how about trivially free, since the sentence, as you sa

Re: question about Good/Evil in a license

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 20.09.2009, 01:10 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: > Trivially non-free (DFSG #6). Also, the word "evil" is far too > subjective to be meaningful in a license. how about trivially free, since the sentence, as you say, is not meaningful in a license and thus has no effect? :-) Greetin

Re: On the possibility of changing the license of Adobe CMap files

Hi, I apologize for digging up this nearly six-year-old email, but I wanted to let you know that we just launched the "CMap Resources" open source project, which includes all of our CMap resources under a more favorable open source license. See: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/