Re: Does this license meet DSFG?

2010-04-23 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Anthony W. Youngman wrote: Is this intentional? No. Because the grant of licence DOES allow regrading, therefore what any particular version of the GPL says is irrelevant. The recipient CAN change the licence from GPL3 to GPL2 (or vice versa) because the *grant*

Re: One-line licence statement

2010-04-23 Thread Simon McVittie
(Summary of the thread for Joey's benefit: some software mentioned on debian-legal had a one-line license which was intended to be almost-public-domain, but failed to give explicit permission to copy and modify. Franck is talking to that software's author to get it relicensed in a DFSG way; I

Re: One-line licence statement

2010-04-23 Thread Joey Hess
Simon McVittie wrote: Not that I know of; judging by putting this wording into Google, only Joey uses it. I called it the ikiwiki basewiki license above, but I don't think that's necessarily a good way to refer to it out of context. The rest of ikiwiki is not under this license (it's mostly