Se não visualizar correctamente esta mensagem,
clique aqui.
Gabriel Burt writes:
> Is changing http://www.emusic.com/favicon.ico to a PNG "modifying" it?
>
> Assume it's not, would we be OK including that image in our Debian
> package of Banshee?
The way iceweasel handles non-free search engine logos is to download
them into the user's local profile when
Le mardi 15 mars 2011 à 11:54 -0500, Gabriel Burt a écrit :
> Is changing http://www.emusic.com/favicon.ico to a PNG "modifying" it?
>
> Assume it's not, would we be OK including that image in our Debian
> package of Banshee?
No, it would not. This icon is not free, in terms of copyright - and
t
We are working on an eMusic.com extension to Banshee. They allow use
(http://www.emusic.com/affiliate/affiliate_faq.html#9) of their
unmodified logo.
Bruce said back in 2005 (on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/08/msg00069.html):
When creating the DFSG, I recognized, and respected,
2011/3/7 Ulrik Sverdrup :
> Can GPLv3+ applications written in Python exist in Debian main? The
> applications in question do not use an openssl exception.
>
> Python uses OpenSSL so the moment the application starts, it is linking
> against it too:
>
> $ objdump -p /usr/bin/python2.6 | grep NEEDED
tag 614525 - pending
thanks
Hi Joerg
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:26:33AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >> [...] It is doubtful that the PostScript files are
> >> the source code referred to by DFSG item 2. More likely is that the
> >> source files are TeX documents.
>
> > Cool, where is the agree
>> [...] It is doubtful that the PostScript files are
>> the source code referred to by DFSG item 2. More likely is that the
>> source files are TeX documents.
> Cool, where is the agreed clearer version of DFSG 2 that says what it
> means by source code?
> I feel it's a grey area, so if the PS f
7 matches
Mail list logo
