Re: XNAT license terms... any chance for main?

2011-06-06 Thread jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/06/2011 01:26, PJ Weisberg wrote: >>> 4. The software has been designed for research purposes only and has not >>> been approved for clinical use. It has not been reviewed or approved by >>> the >>> Food and Drug Administration or by any

Banner Junho de 2011 REFRIMUR

2011-06-06 Thread Refrimur
  Problemas para visualizar a mensagem? Acesse aqui   Clique para não receber nossos emails    

Re: XNAT license terms... any chance for main?

2011-06-06 Thread Ken Arromdee
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, PJ Weisberg wrote: I've seen plenty of software in Debian with a clause similar to #4, usually phrased something like "$foo is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTIC

Re: Bug#628952: minidlna: Possible unknown copyright status of hardcoded image blobs in source code

2011-06-06 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Benoît Knecht [110606 11:57]: > I had a look at these, and I'm pretty sure they're not eligible for > copyright protection (a white 'N' on a blue background is not nearly > creative enough). So I don't think there's a problem there; the license > header should just be corrected to state that the

Re: Bug#628952: minidlna: Possible unknown copyright status of hardcoded image blobs in source code

2011-06-06 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:34:34 +0200 Benoît Knecht wrote: [...] > Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > > While the source code is licensed under GPL2, the file in question only > > > states following: > > > > > > * Penguin images are the creation of Larry Ewing (lew...@isc.tamu.edu) > > > using The GIM

Re: Bug#628952: minidlna: Possible unknown copyright status of hardcoded image blobs in source code

2011-06-06 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:59:11 +0200 Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > > the source code file icons.c includes binary blobs detailing the NetGear > > logo and the Tux logo. > > Hi! > I am a debian-legal subscriber, and I would like to comment on this bug > report. Thanks a lot