Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?

2011-12-05 Thread Clark C. Evans
On Monday, December 05, 2011 10:51 PM, "Andrei Popescu" wrote: > On Lu, 05 dec 11, 21:55:28, Alexey Eromenko wrote: > > "The contrib archive area contains supplemental packages intended to > > work with the Debian distribution, but which require software > > outside of the distribution to either b

Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?

2011-12-05 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Lu, 05 dec 11, 21:55:28, Alexey Eromenko wrote: > > contrib area: > "The contrib archive area contains supplemental packages intended to > work with the Debian distribution, but which require software outside > of the distribution to either build or function." > > This definition does not say

Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?

2011-12-05 Thread Alexey Eromenko
Forwarded one relevant reply from debian-users to debian-legal. By Andrei : == > What's your opinion ? A somewhat similar case: instant messenger clients. Not long ago some of the free (as in beer) instant messaging providers made incompatible changes t

Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?

2011-12-05 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:22:44 -0500 Clark C. Evans wrote: [...] > If such programs are GPLv3, I'd go further and say that Debian > has no right to distribute the work since source code for the > Whole Work is not included in the distribution (5c). [...] I don't think that the GPLv3 source code de

Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?

2011-12-05 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:02:21 -0500 Clark C. Evans wrote: [...] > I'd say that any dependency on non-free remote service fails Debian's > Desert Island Test [...] and as such, even if the remote access is > free-of-charge and functional, the code using it should be limited > to contrib. I am *n