Re: `free' in GNU and DSFG?

Hiroki Horiuchi from Japan > After reading your words, now I think The Free Software Definition is > really permissive, but this very *permissiveness* made GNU's definition > insufficient for Debian Project. > > Am I right? I don't think so. The DFSG dates from 1997. The Free Software Definitio

International Free and Open Source Software Law Review Volume 4, Issue 1

https://lwn.net/Articles/501621/ http://www.ifosslr.org/ifosslr/issue/view/6 -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debi

Re: `free' in GNU and DSFG?

MJ Ray writes: > Think of them as two parallel developments for similar concepts - > one is a definition, the other is a set of guidelines to follow. > Like http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq#four_freedoms says: > > "[the FSF's four freedoms] are the Free Software Foundation's > artic