Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing

2012-11-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:28:08PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > Control: tags -1 pending > (Setting to serious, due to policy violation) > After reading the -legal thread, comments above, the CAcert mailing list > thread, the Fedora explanation, and carefully read

Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing

2012-11-03 Thread Michael Shuler
Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 pending (Setting to serious, due to policy violation) After reading the -legal thread, comments above, the CAcert mailing list thread, the Fedora explanation, and carefully reading the licensing myself, the cautious side of me says the right thing to

Re: ELPA license, LGPL + additional restrictions

2012-11-03 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:13:09PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > - In point 2., clause b) - stating that that you may redistribute > under the terms of the plain GNU GPL - shall NOT apply. In other > words, if you redistribute, you MUST keep the additional permissions > of the LGPL v3 in