Hi,
I am working on packaging ccnet[1] library (requirement for seafile), and the
upstream code has two licenses in the base directory - MIT and GPL-3+.
When I asked for clarification they have replied the code is GPL-3+ with some
parts reused from some other project which was MIT licensed.
Un
Hi!
MJ Ray phonecoop.coop> writes:
>
> Paul Wise debian.org>
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:13 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > The Gaviota Engine licence shouldn't apply to the database files. See
> > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOutput for a similar topic.
> >
> > Sounds like they sho
Paul Wise
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:13 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
> > The Gaviota Engine licence shouldn't apply to the database files. See
> > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOutput for a similar topic.
>
> Sounds like they should go to contrib though, due to the non-free build-dep?
If the
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:13 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
> The Gaviota Engine licence shouldn't apply to the database files. See
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOutput for a similar topic.
Sounds like they should go to contrib though, due to the non-free build-dep?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.
Varun Hiremath
> The chess tablebase files are generated by the Gaviota Engine whose
> license is clearly not DFSG compatible. However, the author is
> releasing the generated database files under the MIT license. Is the
> MIT license for these database files DFSG compatible? [...]
Yes, MIT/X11
5 matches
Mail list logo
