> > > > > > > > - 3. You may not have any income from distributing this source
> > > > > > > > -(or altered version of it) to other developers. When You
> > > > > > > > -use this product in a comercial package, the source may
> > > > > > > > -not be charged seperatly.
> > >
> > > The t
Le Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:04:32AM +1000, Riley Baird a écrit :
> > > > > > > - 3. You may not have any income from distributing this source
> > > > > > > -(or altered version of it) to other developers. When You
> > > > > > > -use this product in a comercial package, the source may
> > > >
> > > > > > - 3. You may not have any income from distributing this source
> > > > > > -(or altered version of it) to other developers. When You
> > > > > > -use this product in a comercial package, the source may
> > > > > > -not be charged seperatly.
> > > >
> > > > But a developer d
> > I'm not sure that you can grant the right of enforcing the license to
> > someone else,
> I suspect that for legal litigation you may need to represent the
> copyright owner.
That's what I meant; I probably didn't word it clearly, though.
pgp4w78cg1zYD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> > Le Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:26:59AM +1000, Riley Baird a écrit :
> > > > >
> > > > > - 3. You may not have any income from distributing this source
> > > > > -(or altered version of it) to other developers. When You
> > > > > -use this product in a comercial package, the source may
> >
On 31/05/15 00:10, Riley Baird wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2015 23:24:53 +0200
Ángel González wrote:
IMHO you would be the one responsible for enforcing the license...
Exactly. So, if a work is originally licensed under GPL-2+ and Person A
makes a copy and gives it to Person B under GPL-3. Now consi
On Sat, 30 May 2015 23:24:53 +0200
Ángel González wrote:
> On 30/05/15 03:30, Riley Baird wrote:
> Only the copyright holder can change what a *work* is licensed as.
> >> Unless the copyright holder grants the permission to do so, I would
> >> say...
> > Let's say I hold copyright on a work,
On 30/05/15 03:30, Riley Baird wrote:
Only the copyright holder can change what a *work* is licensed as.
Unless the copyright holder grants the permission to do so, I would
say...
Let's say I hold copyright on a work, and I grant someone else
permission to change the license of a work. Who woul
Charles Plessy writes:
> If it were me, I would give the benefit of the doubt to the upstream
> author of missfits, and trust him that if he added a GPLv3+ header, it
> is because he modified the files, as he says in the README.
When I adopted the first package from this author (sextractor), I as
9 matches
Mail list logo
