On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Riley Baird wrote:
> Not necessarily. It could mean that you want to be as compatible with
> as many open-source licenses as possible.
The Apache licenses don't fit that definition of "permissive" but they
do fit the definition suggested by Ritesh and the definitio
On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:58:49 +0530
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I was to make a tool for general purpose, to help others, and ensure
> freedom is guaranteed, I'd go with [A]GPL. If I want to make a
> commercial product, I would go and opt for a proprietary license.
>
> Now I see a reas
Hi,
If I was to make a tool for general purpose, to help others, and ensure
freedom is guaranteed, I'd go with [A]GPL. If I want to make a
commercial product, I would go and opt for a proprietary license.
Now I see a reason for people choosing other licenses, like Apache, is
calling it being more
3 matches
Mail list logo
