Walter Landry writes:
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > My personal view is that there would be no problem shipping the PDF,
> > even though Debian's users would have no practical ability to modify
> > this PDF. Making a modified version of a scientific paper like this
> > one is neither useful, nor, unl
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> [Please, Cc to me, since I am not subscribed to debian-legal.]
Done.
> I am considering to package Divand [1], an add-on package for Octave. The
> current upstream tarball [2] contains a PDF file [3] with the following
> copyright and l
Le Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:38:06PM -0700, Walter Landry a écrit :
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > My personal view is that there would be no problem shipping the PDF,
> > even though Debian's users would have no practical ability to modify
> > this PDF. Making a modified version of a scientific paper li
Ian Jackson wrote:
> My personal view is that there would be no problem shipping the PDF,
> even though Debian's users would have no practical ability to modify
> this PDF. Making a modified version of a scientific paper like this
> one is neither useful, nor, unless especial care is taken, ethic
Rafael Laboissière writes ("Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license"):
> [Please, Cc to me, since I am not subscribed to debian-legal.]
>
> I am considering to package Divand [1], an add-on package for Octave. The
> current upstream tarball [2] contains a PDF file [3] with the following
> copy
[Please, Cc to me, since I am not subscribed to debian-legal.]
I am considering to package Divand [1], an add-on package for Octave. The
current upstream tarball [2] contains a PDF file [3] with the following
copyright and licensing conditions: "© Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0
License."
6 matches
Mail list logo