On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:23:25 -0400 Richard Fontana wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:37:32PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 23:28:46 -0400 Richard Fontana wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 05:08:24AM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Do
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:37:32PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 23:28:46 -0400 Richard Fontana wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 05:08:24AM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> >
> > > Do you (or anyone else) _really_ think the copyright holders of the GPL
> > > pro
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:27:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On the other hand, when a larger upstream project
> granted us a linking exception for OpenSSL, they probably did not
> obtain consent from all the copyright holders, either.
Right. For example, I remember one case where a Debian de
* Philip Hands:
> P.P.S. Does anyone really expect a consensus to emerge where we decide
> to ignore the exception to the exception across the board without
> consulting lawyers? I think there are several people in this thread
> (myself included) that have demonstrated that they're going to argue
Quoting Francesco Poli (2017-03-30 23:37:32)
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 23:28:46 -0400 Richard Fontana wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 05:08:24AM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> >
> > > Do you (or anyone else) _really_ think the copyright holders of
> > > the GPL program in question h
5 matches
Mail list logo