Dear debian-legal,
As part of an adoption request , I've been fixing mini-httpd with the help of
my mentor (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036751)
mini-httpd contains portions of code commited by Rob
McCool which seem to originate from NCSA httpd (likely 1.15). Rob's
contrib
> "Johannes" == Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
Johannes> Dear Debian legal, I seek advice on the NXP Software
Johannes> License Agreement and whether binaries licensed under it
Johannes> are redistributable in non-free(-firmware) or not. The
Johannes> full text is at
> "Andrius" == Andrius Merkys writes:
Andrius> Hello, [Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed]
Andrius> I encountered a package EvoEF2 [1] which is licensed under
Andrius> Expat and has the following in its README.md:
Andrius> "EvoEF2 is free to academic users."
Andr
Hi all,
Thank you for your prompt responses.
On 2023-06-22 17:49, Sam Hartman wrote:
I mean under xpat, it's certainly free for academic users, and it's also
free for everyone else.
Unless that statement in the readme is in a section called license or
otherwise claims to be a license, I'd trea
Hi,
Quoting Sam Hartman (2023-06-22 16:46:51)
> > "Johannes" == Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> > writes:
>
> Johannes> Dear Debian legal, I seek advice on the NXP Software
> Johannes> License Agreement and whether binaries licensed under it
> Johannes> are redistributabl
> "Johannes" == Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
>> In such situations we have sometimes had success reaching out to
>> companies and negotiating something.
Johannes> Who is usually doing this reaching out? Individual DDs
Johannes> like myself or official representativ
6 matches
Mail list logo