Re: packaging reverse engineered code when an EULA forbids this

Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com writes: The issue seems to be that reverse engineering is not allowed by IDL's EULA as the files contain following header: IDL Save/Restore files embody unpublished proprietary information about the IDL program. Reverse engineering of this file

Re: copyright years in the copyright file

Riley Baird bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch Could you at least change the debian copyright file? You're not changing the notice there; you're making a new one. I still didn't get the problem. What is the copyright year for? What is the difference if a software is (c) 1999 or

Re: ESO-MIDAS: (not anymore) trademarked GPL package

Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: I don't know whether the holder of the monopoly on the “ESO-MIDAS” name would have the same position. They are not since the trademark is cancelled. Best regards Ole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

ESO-MIDAS: (not anymore) trademarked GPL package

Hi, I think about packaging the eso-midas program [1] which is GPL. However, the web page states that | The official name, ESO-MIDAS, is a registered trademark Searching for more details, I found out that the trademark is cancelled since 1999 [2]. Can I now just take eso-midas as package