Re: "Open Source" Motif

On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 04:48:25AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 02:32:21PM +0200, Martin Konold wrote: > > Due to the fact that the GPL is according to RMS incompatible to anything > > except itself > > That is blatantly false, and I find it hard to believe RMS would ha

Re: Is this DFSG-free?

On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 02:01:33PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > [ please keep me on the Cc: list. Thanks ] > > Hi, > > is this free: > > # Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this software and > # its documentation without fee, and without a written agreement, is > #

Re: for any putpose and without fee?

> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its > documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided > that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that > copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting > doc

Re: Is this DFSG-free ?

> Is the following DFSG-free? It is the license of the "Standard ML of New > Jersey" system. It does not discrimate commercial uses but it *does* worry > me that there is a requirement of only distributing "without fee" ... "Without fee", IMHO, means here that distributor would not have to pay f