Hi all,
I have been reading the huge thread about the CDDL and its clause of
venue, and I'm wondering.. Lets imagine a CDDL license without this
clause, would it be classified as free?
--
Greetings, alo.
http://www.alobbs.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Some days ago I asked about the viability the idea of creating a new
>> architecture of Debian using the OpenSolaris stack.
>
> Just the kernel or libc as well?
That is something in which we will have to think if there isn't any
issue with the license. By the mome
ork with Initial Developer and Contributors to distribute such
responsibility on an equitable basis. Nothing herein is intended or
shall be deemed to constitute any admission of liability.
--- Begin Message ---
Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/22/05, Alvaro L
Hi all,
I would like to know what do you guys think about the CDDL license
[1]. Does it meet with the Debian Free Software Guidelines?
I've started a discussion [2] on the OpenSolaris mail list about my
proposal of creating a new Debian architecture based on OpenSolaris.
The first th
Hi all,
I would like to know what do you guys think about the CDDL license
[1]. Does it meet with the Debian Free Software Guidelines?
I've started a discussion [2] on the OpenSolaris mail list about my
proposal of creating a new Debian architecture based on OpenSolaris.
The first th
5 matches
Mail list logo
