Francesco Poli wrote:
> Wait, wait!
Nah, release often, release soon :P
> The key question here is: does the DFSG-free part *require* the
> non-free part for compilation or use?
Yes.
> In other words: does the DFSG-free game provide *no* significant
> functionality *without* the non-free data i
Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Are there any contradictory evidences for including this package into
> Debian in the way offered by me?
I don't think so, many games in Debian are in the same situation and
need to ship the non-free data separately.
> is it possible to include the package into Debian?
Please disregard this message, as:
Jakub Nadolny wrote:
> Polish translation is already free, I have discussed it on
> debian-legal and I have contacted Zbigniew Becker, author of Polish
> translation. He agreed to use this as "license": Creative Commons
> Public Domain Dedication
> http://creativ
I have downloaded the latest source from upstream:
http://freshmeat.net/redir/display-dhammapada/41408/url_tgz/display-dhammapada-0.23.tar.gz
The polish translation now states this:
This publication is not copyrighted. One can copy it and use any part
of it with mentioning the source. Publishers
h01ger wrote:
> The logo still looks like the debian swirl in blue plus some rotation
> to me...
/me wonders...
Isn't the Debian swirl logo just a very basic Adobe Illustrator
template? How are we going to enforce anything?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/06/msg00340.html
http://lists.d
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley wrote:
> The GPL &c are allowed to be copied only in full without any
> modifications.
Yes, we should put the GPL itself in non-free, and all the rest of
Debian in contrib :-)
--
.''`. Y al final, números rojos, en la cuenta del olvido
: :' :
6 matches
Mail list logo
