Re: rocks-n-diamonds

2006-12-01 Thread Amaya
Francesco Poli wrote: Wait, wait! Nah, release often, release soon :P The key question here is: does the DFSG-free part *require* the non-free part for compilation or use? Yes. In other words: does the DFSG-free game provide *no* significant functionality *without* the non-free data

Re: rocks-n-diamonds

2006-11-27 Thread Amaya
Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: Are there any contradictory evidences for including this package into Debian in the way offered by me? I don't think so, many games in Debian are in the same situation and need to ship the non-free data separately. is it possible to include the package into Debian?

Help with bug #285156 - Non free translation

2006-10-26 Thread Amaya
I have downloaded the latest source from upstream: http://freshmeat.net/redir/display-dhammapada/41408/url_tgz/display-dhammapada-0.23.tar.gz The polish translation now states this: This publication is not copyrighted. One can copy it and use any part of it with mentioning the source. Publishers

Re: Logo rip-off

2005-10-13 Thread Amaya
h01ger wrote: The logo still looks like the debian swirl in blue plus some rotation to me... /me wonders... Isn't the Debian swirl logo just a very basic Adobe Illustrator template? How are we going to enforce anything? http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/06/msg00340.html

Re: If DFSG apply to non-software, is GPL*L* incompatible with DFSG?

2004-02-28 Thread Amaya
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley wrote: The GPL c are allowed to be copied only in full without any modifications. Yes, we should put the GPL itself in non-free, and all the rest of Debian in contrib :-) -- .''`. Y al final, números rojos, en la cuenta del olvido : :' :