Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:25:26PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: I've been contacted by Ann Barcomb (see her message below; below that is her second message to me) about the Perl module license issue. I've put her on the Cc and would appreciate

Perl module license clarification

statement is even explicitly suggested by e.g. perlmodlib(1) and pod2man(1), making using the license a practice endorsed and accepted by the Perl community. I would like to know what exactly the issue here is, and which course of action to take to eliviate this issue. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van

Re: Perl module license clarification

, 04 Feb 2003, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: On a Debian system a copy of the Perl license can be found in the file '/usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic'. Or, as in my packages: License: GPL, Artistic, available at /usr/share/common-licenses/{GPL,Artistic} I would like to know

PDFlib license clarification request

::AxPoint of the AxKit package and Perl module XML::Handler::AxPoint are dependent on that Perl module. Am I right in thinking these latter two also have to go in contrib then? Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo GnuPG fp

Re: PDFlib license clarification request

Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 10:24:38PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: I'm ITP'ing PDFlib which has an Aladdin Free Public License. The full text is available from http://www.pdflib.com/pdflib/aladdin-license.pdf which in short and non