Op 24/04/2011 14:02, Stefano Zacchiroli schreef:
I think the
first step to do is to get hold of the original cease and desist
mail. Has anyone managed to have it yet?
This story sounds too absurd to be true.
I've googled for the keywords "Media Art Holland" and I can't find the
web site of that
Op 8/03/2011 16:45, Josselin Mouette schreef:
Hi, and thanks for the effort of providing the complete information.
Le lundi 07 mars 2011 à 09:31 +, Andrew Ross a écrit :
The software itself is the current version of iText, which is licensed
under the AGPL with the following additional term:
Op 7/03/2011 13:26, Simon McVittie schreef:
In this particular situation I'd suggest making the extra term a
non-binding request, something like:
The author of this software requests that you retain the iText producer
line in every PDF that is created or manipulated using iText.
or ev
Op 7/03/2011 11:12, Charles Plessy schreef:
Le Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:06:22AM +0100, Bruno Lowagie a écrit :
Op 7/03/2011 11:02, Charles Plessy schreef:
Regardless of the purpose and the intentions behind requiring to ‘retain the
producer line in every PDF that is created or manipulated using
Op 7/03/2011 11:02, Charles Plessy schreef:
Regardless of the purpose and the intentions behind requiring to ‘retain the
producer line in every PDF that is created or manipulated using iText’, if this
addition to the AGPL does not fall under Section 7(b), this makes iText
potentially
incompatib
For some reason, my latest answers weren't sent to the list, but to
individual people.
Sorry for that. This is my latest response:
Andrew Ross wrote:
My reasoning goes that if I write some software which uses iText to
produce a pdf, then if I use some other piece of software to modify
that pdf
Op 7/03/2011 2:17, MJ Ray schreef:
Bruno Lowagie wrote:
Please don't avoid the question: does the freedom to hide information
prevail over the freedom to get information?
You mean like you avoided the question: what is the actual case here?
No problem. Let me describe the context. I&#x
Op 6/03/2011 18:00, Josselin Mouette schreef:
This is not a metaphor. It is about something that is not software,
for which you try to apply software reasoning. I fail to see where you
want to go with this.
*10 Q: Does the DFSG apply only to computer programs?
**A:* No, we apply our standards
Hello,
I'm confronted with a very special case for which I've written a
metaphor. I'd like your opinion on this case.
Imagine that using software is like baking cookies. A free/open source
cookie specialist, company A, distributes recipes that are free in the
sense of the AGPL: everybody is
9 matches
Mail list logo
