[Please continue to Cc me on replies. Thanks]
-=| Walter Landry, Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 05:08:14AM -0800 |=-
MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
Damyan Ivanov d...@debian.org wrote:
Most of the code is licensed under the same terms as Perl
itself,
[...]
In addition to that, some icons
[Please continue to Cc me on replies. Thanks]
-=| MJ Ray, Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:15:21PM + |=-
Damyan Ivanov d...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
The files are separate, i.e. no compilation in the C source --
object code sense is taking place. The icons are loaded at runtime
and used
[Please Cc me on replies. Thanks]
My upstream uses several licenses and this makes be feel a bit uneasy
deciding if they can be combined. Please advice.
Most of the code is licensed under the same terms as Perl itself,
which means either Artistic license, or (at your opinion) GPL (any
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: rt2860-source
Version : 1.7.0.0
Upstream Author : Ralink Tech Inc
* URL : http://www.ralinktech.com/
* License : GPL-2+ some binary non-free firmware
Programming Lang: C
[Please keep CC debian-perl]
Dear debian-legal readers,
Currently, libsys-syslog-perl has the following debian/copyright:
[...]
Upstream Author: Sebastien Aperghis-Tramoni
This package contains the following copyright notice:
This program is free software; you can redistribute it
in the
coming weeks and months.
MJRay, may we have your comments too? Olivier sent me copies of some
off-list discussion in which you tend to agree that new license is ok
for Debian.
Firendly,
dam
--
Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Triplett wrote:
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
=== The problematic? clause ===
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or
organization (”You”) obtaining a copy of this software and associated
documentation files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:48:53 +0300 Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Please bear in mind
that IBPP is really to be used in FlameRobin's packaging, not by
itself.
I see, but imagine which permissions someone would get, if he/she wanted
the above terms.
So the questions is: Is this DFSG-free or not? Please bear in mind
that IBPP is really to be used in FlameRobin's packaging, not by itself.
dam
--
Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.creditreform.bg/
phone
here ftp-masters' ruling so I know what to do.
Thanks,
dam
--
Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.creditreform.bg/
phone: +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993fax: +359(2)920-0994
mob. +359(88)856-6067 [EMAIL
Hi, Milan,
[Yet another cross-post to debian-legal, whose comments are needed at
the lower part of this mail. Thanks]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes. If possible, I intend to convince everyone to dual license FR under
GPL and someting else.
How
on IBPP licensing
Resent-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:47:00 -0600 (CST)
Resent-From: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:46:53 +
From: MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED
always far better.
Thank you Francesco, Walter and Justin,
Unfortunatelly upstream seem to insist on their license and what's worse,
resist to changing it. Anyway, I'll try mu super-suggestive powers to make them
see the spoon melt :)
Thanks again,
dam
--
Damyan Ivanov
either.
Thanks in advance for your comments,
dam
[1] http://www.ibpp.org/
[2] http://flamerobin.sf.net/
[3] http://www.editthis.info/ibpp/index.php/License
- --
Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.creditreform.bg/
phone: +359(2
the arvhices.
IIRC, lst time it was suggested that this is not a copy of the debian logo, but
a logo created using the same brush and the same spiral tool in Adobe
Illustrator as the logo of Debian.
dam
--
Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED
for QPL too, right?
dam
--
Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.creditreform.bg/
phone: +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993fax: +359(2)920-0994
mob. +359(88)856-6067 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gaim
signature.asc
Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:13:31PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Various people believe the MPL to be non-free, but there's code under it
in the main archive at the moment so it's unlikely that an upload would
be rejected for that reason. Exhibit B basically says You can't
Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:18:20PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Are you proposing that any other (i.e. non-Mozilla) package in main,
that is licensed under MPL or MPL-derivate has to be expelled?
I'm merely agreeing with the general sentiment that the MPL is non-free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
George Danchev wrote:
On Saturday 17 September 2005 13:45, MJ Ray wrote:
Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IDPL 1.0 is MPL-derivate.
http://flamerobin.sourceforge.net/license.html
http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.0.txt
I think MPL is doomed
recently uploaded firebird2)
Thanks for your advice,
dam
- --
Damyan Ivanov 0x9725F63B Creditreform Bulgaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.creditreform.bg/
phone: +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993fax: +359(2)920-0994
mob. +359(88)856-6067 ICQ 3028500 [EMAIL
fee for such sale.
Since I am not a lawer, and since the policy suggests to ask here if in
doubt, I am asking for your opinion. Is the above license DFSG-compliant
or not?
thanks,
dam
--[Cc: me, I am not subscibed]--
--
Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria
MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-06-15 14:23:06 +0100 Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may distribute under the terms of either the GNU General Public
License or the Artistic License, as specified in the Perl README file,
with the exception that it cannot be placed on a CD-ROM or similar media
22 matches
Mail list logo
