again?
>
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a2
-- * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++>*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS--
rules on this.
>
> Shall I restart the document freenes discussion on -policy?
>
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK--
p to the (even if it is broken) license.
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK COD
n they are done ;)
>
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- --
We can ask the new project leader to issue the permission and ask for the link
when the election is through ;)
On 29-Jan-99 Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 09:51:51AM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
>>
>> On 29-Jan-99 Brian Ristuccia wrote:
>> > In order to pro
enham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++>*
* KC7YAQ
--
>
> All graphics, image and icon files included with Postilion are copyright
> 1998, 1999 by Marco van Hylckama Vlieg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> These graphics may be freely distributed and modified but ONLY
> _WITH_ this program (Postilion).
>
> jnb 1/30/1999
>
This is non-
raphics and
documentation licensed like Postilion and WPrefs.app will be made non-free.
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOC
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 10:10:20PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> I see a couple of remarks being made by people:
> * we can't possibly check all uses of the term `Debian', either in
> company, product or domainnames
> * people using Debian-derived products should be free to use the term
>
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 04:56:48PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 02:02:58PM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
> > * You are not allowed to use Debian in a way that would be detrimental to
> > the reputation of the Debian Project.
>
> I considered so
Bruce Sass wrote:
> ...then the license of the patent code became non-free at some later
> date.
non-free. A Free License to "anything" can not be revoked ('cept maybe by
the licnesee violating the license and that would be on a
single-case-by-case basis). If a "free software" relied on a non-fre
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 12:15:00PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> >> The DNSsafe software cannot be used or distributed separately from the
> >> BIND software. You only have the right to use it or distribute it as
> >> a bundled, integrated product.
>
> Which section of the DFSG does this violate?
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 12:55:12PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> I'm sorry, but your understanding is severely lacking or else you do
> not agree with the free software premise that Debian is based upon, in
> which case I would have to question why you are a Debian developer at
> all.
>
> The GPL
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 01:44:42PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > That is your opinion (and the opinion of most of us) but it's still not the
> > "fact" you make it out to be. GPL *does* restrict your rights. If you
> > found a kewl foobar program but wanted to put the xforms front end to it,
> >
On Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 09:34:55PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> DB> GPL *does* restrict your rights. If you found a kewl foobar
> DB> program but wanted to put the xforms front end to it, you can't.
> DB> Well, you can, but then you can't distribute it to anyone,
> DB> anywhere.
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 02:04:11PM -0800, Dragon wrote:
> What I was getting at earlier was trying to gently point out that you
> cannot modify the GPL. It's copyrighted by the FSF. You may only
> distribute it verbatim. Ergo, you can't tack anything onto the end, even
> if you rename it.. (The cop
17 matches
Mail list logo
