Re: [cups-devel] CUPS License Change Coming

2017-11-09 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
(Dropping cups-devel@, adding debian-printing@ and ftpmasters) Le mercredi, 8 novembre 2017, 22.53:51 h CET Ben Finney a écrit : > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes: > > Is Apple going with "pristine" Apache License 2.0 [1] without further > > exceptions? > &

Re: [cups-devel] CUPS License Change Coming

2017-11-07 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le mardi, 7 novembre 2017, 15.05:19 h CET Michael Sweet a écrit : > Apple is excited to announce that starting with CUPS 2.3 we will be > providing CUPS under the terms of the Apache License, Version 2.0. > > For more information about the Apache License, Version 2.0, please see the > Apache Softw

SEIKO EPSON license, suitable for non-free ?

2012-12-07 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi debian-legal, To ease the installation of the various Epson drivers [0], I'd like to get them uploaded to Debian (even non-free would be an improvement over their download page). Some of the packages come with source, others not. But these packages all come with the "SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION

Re: The Debian open logo with "Debian" is not compliant to the Debian policy (RC bugs #587482, #587664 and #587668)

2010-11-02 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi all, (Context: while hunting for an RC bug to fix, I fell on #587668 and then asked for advice on #debian-release, where a discussion was held. Here's my summary of the issue.) As the title of the bugreports mention, the issue is that the Debian Open Use Logo (DOUL) with "Debian" is not c

Packaging the MeeGo stack on Debian - Use the name ?

2010-10-20 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi dear MeeGo-dev, (some CCs added for convenience and openness) I am Didier 'OdyX' Raboud, a Debian Maintainer and I am part of the "pkg-meego" group on Debian. Our (blurry) intent is to allow Debian users to benefit from the software that comes out of the MeeGo project. F

Re: The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.

2010-03-26 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Josselin Mouette schrieb: >> Definitely non-free, and the author’s clarification removes any doubt. > > Hmmm... Actually... As he didn't gave a definition of "good" or "evil" > one could argue, that everything is good... for someone. > > However, I would strongl