Re: Expat + exception = DFSG-compatible?

On Tuesday 13 October 2015 12:50:55 MJ Ray wrote: > On 10/13/15 08:50, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > Listing known offenders in addition to the text of the license wouldn't > > be violation of DFSG §5, right? > > Yes, it probably would - how would the listed people ever gain

Re: Expat + exception = DFSG-compatible?

ible manner and how... -- Regards, Dmitry Smirnov. --- Truth — Something somehow discreditable to someone. -- H. L. Mencken, 1949 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Expat + exception = DFSG-compatible?

the same as Termination so I wonder if it is possible to list license revocations in a DFSG-compliant manner... -- Best wishes, Dmitry Smirnov. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Expat + exception = DFSG-compatible?

GPL ones except that is is explicitly added to the license in order to blacklist a known offender. Any thoughts? Thanks. [1]: https://github.com/martin-denizet/redmine_login_audit#license -- Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov. --- The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, con

CC-BY-SA-4.0

ation. It would be especially nice if someone could refer to or write a short digest about differences from v3.0. Thanks. [1]: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode [2]: https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses -- Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov. signature.asc Description: This is a

DEP-5 best practice

Hello, I'm seeking your advise regarding DEP-5 application: I'm documenting copyright/licensing for a software released under GPL-3+ ## ## Files: * ## Copyright: © 1995-2001,2003-2008 Free Software Foundation ## License: GPL-3+ ## But most files have GPL-2+ header which can be written as ##