El 9/10/22 a les 13:08, Patrice Coni ha escrit:
Dear debian-legal people,
I develop a software that downloads the daily picture from Bing or
Windows Spotlight and set it as wallpaper on a X11 desktop environment.
Bing or Windows Spotlight are features of Microsoft.
The daily picture is
El 24/7/19 a les 22:28, Florian Weimer ha escrit:
> * Adam Borowski:
>
>> In the light of the currently discussed GR proposal, I wonder if the
>> following license clause would be considered DFSG-free and GPL-compatible:
>>
>> ##
>> I do not consider a flat tarball to be a
El 21/3/19 a les 11:17, Giacomo Tesio ha escrit:
> So why do you think that this is a "toxic precedent"?
No free software could run under Windows without proper Microsoft
licensing: Firefox, Libreoffice...
No free software could use or implement compatible Windows services,
either server or
El 12/12/18 a les 16:06, Ian Jackson ha escrit:
> As for the first link, it says only
> | Copyright, licensing and patent issues
> | Discussions about legality issues such as copyrights, patents etc.
>
> which IMO accurately describes the scope of the list within Debian.
IIRC there was a
El 11/12/18 a les 23:46, Paul Jakma ha escrit:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018, Eloi Notario wrote:
>
>> Furthermore, these patches will be protected by the GPLv3 and even if
>> publicly available Sencha will be unable to sell them,
>
> Probably you know this, and you mean
El 11/12/18 a les 22:33, Giacomo ha escrit:
> On December 11, 2018 7:54:16 PM UTC, Eloi Notario wrote:
>> El 11/12/18 a les 9:53, Giacomo Tesio ha escrit:
>>> [...]
>>> 2. If ExtJs was a Derived Work of a software release under the
>> Hacking
>>> Licen
El 11/12/18 a les 9:53, Giacomo Tesio ha escrit:
> [...]
> 2. If ExtJs was a Derived Work of a software release under the Hacking
> License, Sencha would have no right to keep any version proprietary.
Being Sencha the copyright owner (noting for clarity as I cut that from
the quote), I am quite
El 08/03/17 a les 08:24, Mike Hommey ha escrit:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 07:46:29AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>>> The best analysis of this situation I have read so far is the one in
>>> Noodles' blog:
>>>
El 24/05/16 a les 12:36, Dmitry Bogatov ha escrit:
> There is 'cbits/conv.c' in 'haskell-unix-time' source package, which
> is probably is of same copyright, as haskell code (BSD-3-clause),
> but there is part of it, that is explicitly marked as all-rights-reserved.
> No email is provided. This
9 matches
Mail list logo
