eby relicense all versions of latex2html under the GNU GPL, version
> 2.", I believe that would be sufficent.
IIRC, latex2html has several authors, several of them not reachable
easily...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSC
ummaries make
sense. Noone contacted me after this discussion with a new summary and I
didn't care enough to dig out the result of the discussion, I just
decided the people on debian-legal would surely contact the web team if
they want any changes...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECT
etter idea how to better present the
work of debian-legal.
Comments, objections?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:33:02AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff again
> > until someone comes up with a better idea how to better present the
> > work of debian-legal.
>
>
prohibited and may be
> unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
> message in error. Thank you.
Always entertaining to read this on a Debian mailing list *g*
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
CTED]
user debian-release@lists.debian.org
usertag 123456 + nonfree-doc gfdl
<-->
If you want to add something to your bug's subject like [NONFREE-DOC]
to make it easier recognisable, just do it, it isn't mandatory though.
Gruesse,
Current version can be found at
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:32:01AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since one of our release goals for etch is to remove any non-DFSG-free
> > do
e further insight)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ange."
Or does this not imply that I have to give my name, too? Have I only to
state the fact _that_ I changed the files?
TIA,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
tices with them seem to be GPL licenced, so they aren't
affected by this bug.
If my conclusion above are right, I think the SPI board has to handle that
bug...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
upposed to be), it is non-free. :-P
Has anyone cared to check the source code of the page?
This sections begins with a comment:
So please just ask CC if they could make this fact more obvious (i.e.
not just using different backgroudn colors).
[not on this list, so please CC me]
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
th and I are working on providing such information on the
Debian website, but that was stalled by other tasks of us.
Coming soon... ;)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
some time for feedback and improval suggestions.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
pgp8cYfE0F4Pm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 10:29:13PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just completed the first version of these pages (loosly based on the
> > pages of the security team), put them online and added a first
> > license
s is to become similar to the pages from the
>
> FSF http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
>
> and
>
> OSI http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html
Added them to the index page (perhaps they still need more surrounding
text though).
Thanks for the suggestion.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:17:29AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-30 03:49]:
> > I just completed the first version of these pages (loosly based on the
> > pages of the security team), put them online and added a first
> >
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:12:28AM +0100, Lewis Jardine wrote:
> >Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>I just completed the first version of these pages (loosly based on the
> >>pages of the security team), put them online and ad
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 03:35:04AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:49:34AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ (and every other mirror of
> > course).
> >
> > Please take a look and comment. The pages a
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:00:50PM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:49:34AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Please take a look and comment. The pages are currently not linked nor
> > mentioned on the rest of the website. I will add this after giving you
&g
24.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/license10.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/01/msg5.html
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/01/msg00262.html
[4] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/12/msg00141.html
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: htt
; factor, as otherwise the patent licence seems irrelevant. Why include
> it if there are no patents, though?
In my case it is a rather trivial Perl module (I18N::AcceptLanguage), to
write it was probably less time consuming than this discussion. Perhaps
I could ask the author why he uses such a
Sorry for my long response time. Have fixed this now. The missing words
were "license povides."
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
22 matches
Mail list logo
