Re: Linuxsampler license

Foundation's Free Software definition. I think upstream only meant to make it clear to developers of proprietary software that they need to ask for a special license if they don't want to follow the GPL. Regards, -- Göran Weinholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian developer, sysadmin, netadmin signature.asc

Problem with mush's license

and the source code is modified quite extensively (the .diff.gz is 131K). Are we allowed to distribute the modified sources in this manner, and binaries built from them? Regards, -- Göran Weinholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - student/sysadm/Debian developer GPG: 1024D/4A8854E6 EC27 7F6A DFA9 CBBD 9EE3 F07A 8DF5 8BB6