Re: [RESOLVED] Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software

Hi, On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:50:29AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 03:04:30 +0200 Gregory Colpart wrote: > > > Upstreams change license to BSD-like to be sure to have DFSG > > license :) Next version will be released under BSD license : > > The L

[RESOLVED] Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software

On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:47:39PM +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote: > I want to package Forwards (see my ITP [1]), a non-Apache > software under Apache License 1.1 [2]). Upstreams change license to BSD-like to be sure to have DFSG license :) Next version will be released under BSD license :

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [sork] About license of sork modules]

r 2006 21:08:30 -0400 From: Chuck Hagenbuch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Rostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sork] About license of sork modules Quoting Gregory Colpart <[EMAI

Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software

2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 [3] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/info/BSD_3Clause.html [4] http://www.horde.org/licenses/bsdl.php [5] http://www.horde.org/licenses/gpl.php Regards, -- Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Li

Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software

t my package will be DFSG-compliant ? [1] : http://bugs.debian.org/362652 [2] : http://cvs.horde.org/co.php?r=1.1.2.2&f=forwards%2FLICENSE&p=1 [3] : http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2000/06/msg00103.html [4] : http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/08/msg00205.html Regards, -- Grego