> I repeat: I think the license is free enough to go into main, but I still
> would like to see it clarified.
OK -- I'll see if I can get some words in.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
> Guido van Rossum writes:
> > Ask your own lawyer.
John Hasler:
> We don't have one. We cannot afford to pay attorneys, and they evidently
> do not consider free software projects worthy of their pro bono efforts.
>
> > I really can't tell what harm there
uld put a version into main,
> somebody could download it from there and ask CNRI if he's now allowed to
> use it according to the license terms. Depending on CNRI's answer, we
> still could decide to remove it from main without legal consequences (at
> least that's how I would understand (7) ;-)
I say there's no need to ask.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
latter but I am unable to fix it.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
> I replied to the list and later realized that you probably do not
> subscribe to it. So here is a courtesy copy. :-)
Indeed. I didn't see your message in the list archives either.
> Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 1. This CNRI LICENSE AGREE
ument that accompies the source distribution.
Sorry, I shouldn't have included those bits -- they are for on-line
downloading only and will be absent from the source package.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
n, and if not, what
problems it has.
Remember: I can't promise that this will be the license -- but I'm
trying!
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
7 matches
Mail list logo
