Re: FAIwiki Copyrights

2005-08-05 Thread Henning Sprang
Hi Geert, On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 16:24 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > >[...] > > As Holger pointed out it could be very complicated to even change the > > copyright after people put even a bit of content in, I put a copy of as > > well as a link to the creative commons 2.5 attribution license in th

[Fwd: Re: FAIwiki Copyrights]

2005-08-06 Thread Henning Sprang
; Subject: Re: FAIwiki Copyrights > Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:42:43 -0500 > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:29:20PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:15:54PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote: > > > On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 16:24 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > &g

FAIwiki - proposal for an other License but Creative Commons - was: Re: FAIwiki Copyrights

2005-08-06 Thread Henning Sprang
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 22:48 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi debian-legal, hi fai :-) > > On Friday 05 August 2005 17:29, Geert Stappers wrote: > > | Under the following conditions: > > | by > > | Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the > > | author or licensor. > >

Re: FAIwiki - proposal for an other License but Creative Commons - was: Re: FAIwiki Copyrights

2005-08-06 Thread Henning Sprang
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 01:21 -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > On 8/6/05, Henning Sprang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's in fact an interesting question if there is somebody alive and > > reading mail in debian-legal. Or do we need to prove that fai is a > >