copyright as
you suggest he is thinking about, i suppose previous versions are GPL
and DFSG compliant.
--
bye,
Hugo Espuny [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNUPG key:
debian developer[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pub 1024D/E8074ECF 2002-06-28
For more info, visit http://www.debian.org |
k FB to prioritize this matter.
--
bye,
Hugo Espuny [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNUPG key:
debian developer[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pub 1024D/E8074ECF 2002-06-28
For more info, visit http://www.debian.org | sub 1024g/2953AFAB 2002-06-28
GNUPG key fingerprint: D324 3DC4 1F2A 0936
*/
/* */
/* Copyright (c) 2002 by Francisco Burzi*/
/* http://phpnuke.org */
/*
will try to do my best on it.
--
bye,
Hugo Espuny [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNUPG key:
debian developer[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pub 1024D/E8074ECF 2002-06-28
For more info, visit http://www.debian.org | sub 1024g/2953AFAB 2002-06-28
GNUPG key fingerprint: D324 3DC4 1F2A 0936
about moving it to non-free. This
is already decided and will be done.
Thanks for the rest of explanations, anyway.
--
bye,
Hugo Espuny [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNUPG key:
debian developer[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pub 1024D/E8074ECF 2002-06-28
For more info, visit http://www.debia
h such an antisocial upstream.
Perhaps... I don't know him personally. And i understand that he
probably receives _a lot_ of mail about phpnuke. So i will give him
another chance.
Anyway, i inherit your position like an "a)"
--
bye,
Hugo Espuny [EMAIL PROTE
Hugo Espuny wrote:
3) Where i have to send my vote: to _debian-devel_ as a reply of this
Obviously i meant "debian-legal" ;-)
--
bye,
Hugo Espuny [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNUPG key:
debian developer[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pub 1024D/E8074ECF 2002-06-28
For
like he is gonna answer me,
since this is not the first time i try to reach him unsuccessfully.
--
bye,
Hugo Espuny| GNUPG key:
debian developer[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pub 1024D/E8074ECF 2002-06-28
For more info, visit http://www.debian.org | sub 1024g/2953A
8 matches
Mail list logo
