rt the app to
QT 2 or convert it yourself.
Ivan
--
--------
Ivan E. Moore II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
EG plugin for
The GIMP.
--
--------
Ivan E. Moore II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
e any alternative (and working) java 1.3 versions with
> better license/speed/etc?
that I'm not sure about..but there are alternatives..not sure there
licenses.
Ivan
--
Ivan E. Moore II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 12:31:49PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
>
> > kdenetwork -
>
> > This will all happen after qt2.2 is released with the GPL lic and
> > packaged/uploaded...
> > (except for kdelibs and suppor
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 03:40:27AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 02:22:41AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > > > What is the current stance on programs that bind to qt 2.x which is
> > > > using
> > > > the QPL 2.0 license and a
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 02:35:30AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 01:59:10AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > What is the current stance on programs that bind to qt 2.x which is using
> > the QPL 2.0 license and are GPL'd or LGPL'd?
>
> Qt
What is the current stance on programs that bind to qt 2.x which is using
the QPL 2.0 license and are GPL'd or LGPL'd?
Ivan
--
--------
Ivan E. Moore II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
e not FUD.
Plus...some of us Like KDE. :)
(tho I'd love to see a gnome/kde mix.)
Ivan
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ivan E. Moore II Rev. Krusty
http://www.tdyc.com
8 matches
Mail list logo