Artwork in sourceforge.net pages

2006-08-24 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
Hi. I've made a modified version of an icon that shows on a sourceforge.net page (http://timidity.sourceforge.net/). The program is GPL but that icon isn't distributed with the tarball. Before bugging again who I suppose is the copyright holder, I've read the sourceforge's terms of use and got to

Re: Artwork in sourceforge.net pages

2006-08-25 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
En/na Weakish Jiang ha escrit: > >> "Content located on any SourceForge.net-hosted subdomain which is >> subject to the sole editorial control of the owner or licensee of such >> subdomain, shall be subject to the OSI-approved license applicable to >> such Source Code, or to such other licensing a

Re: Artwork in sourceforge.net pages

2006-08-25 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
En/na Weakish Jiang ha escrit: >> Of course, they aren't sufficient to grant it. But the fact that only >> GPL is mentioned, terms of use requiring the same license, alternative >> arragements apparently not made... overall they give me the impression >> that the artwork may be free enough. > > Te

Re: Artwork in sourceforge.net pages

2006-08-30 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
En/na Javier Serrano Polo ha escrit: > So the next step will be to contact OSTG (that is, if I don't receive > any answer from the owner). It looks like that step will have to wait till next time. There's some official distributable artwork already, so it's no big deal to ke

Generating VST headers

2006-08-30 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
Hi, again. You may have heard about VST and its non-free headers. I'm using a free program that optionally supports that technology and, of course, it'd be nice to have that support in main. I believe reverse engineering is legal, even a common practice (so I've read in some messages in this list

Re: Generating VST headers

2006-09-07 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
En/na Free Ekanayaka ha escrit: > Hi Javier, > > sorry for the delay, but I was on holiday and I'm still recovering the > old mails.. Oh my, you don't need to apologize. > JSP> Oh, that reminds me. Free Ekanayaka, did you get explicit permission > JSP> from Torben Hohn? You know that Steinbe

Re: Generating VST headers

2006-09-11 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
En/na Free Ekanayaka ha escrit: > I do not fully understand what should be done, however I think would > worth trying, and I can help in that (e.g. by contacting the involved > developers). > Is there somebody on this list able to expose in simple what could be > done? I should warn you. You w

Re: Generating VST headers

2006-09-12 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
En/na Free Ekanayaka ha escrit: > JSP> I should warn you. You won't be the first one trying this. Others have > JSP> already failed, including me. > > It sounds rather scaring :( Considering the guy who was making the Ubuntu package failed, I don't think you're gonna do better. > Is dssi-vst

Re: Generating VST headers

2006-09-20 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
En/na Free Ekanayaka ha escrit: > JSP> Have you thought about packaging an installer? > > No, but sounds as a good idea to me. What would the install do exactly > in your opinion? When configuring, the user must accept Steinberg's license. This is an online process. I'd try to parse the license

Re: Generating VST headers

2006-09-20 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
En/na Daniel James ha escrit: > I believe the only long-term solution is for Steinberg to release the > headers under a free software compatible licence. I don't think this is > impossible now, for several reasons... > > 1. Steinberg is now owned by Yamaha, a hardware company > 2. Yamaha is active

[Fwd: Re: Non-free artwork in games]

2008-10-27 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
games.com no longer works. The deal was this: Hammer Technologies sold a game factory and clearly stated games wouldn't have any distribution problem (copyright, license, whatever). Missatge reenviat ---- De: Javier Serrano Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Per a: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ass