On 10/7/05, Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A multi-licence wiki would be both detrimental from the perspective of
using it (stuff from one page couldn't necessarily be moved into
another, a dump of all the data would have to be divided up by-licence
before use) but I think also un
#head-8e5fcc0c3c1e66d5aa597e6eb493fe1d6f9149ba
--
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of this is at least one page to be
migrated, this work has not been stalled.
--
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
..
--
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
or advice that you
can offer I would be very grateful to hear them :-)
[1] http://wiki.debian.net/copyright.html
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/WikiLicencingTerms
Yours,
--
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
with this, but I thought it should be mentioned...
On the plus side, it may make obtaining higher-resolution versions
than are available on the debian www 'misc' section easier!
--
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/
? :(
--
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
I am emailing the list to ask your advice regarding a collection of licences
which the doom engine and related engines have been licenced under. This is in
relation to bug #264816 , `doomlegacy-sdl: combines incompatible, non-dfsg
licences'.
The doom computer game consists of two
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:36:10 +0200, Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't check the sources, but from your description, if
Am Di, den 10.08.2004 schrieb Jon Dowland um 17:12:
They later released it under the GPL licence[2].
is true, then
1) [snip]
is not true, since
9 matches
Mail list logo
