Re: ia64 port

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Stephane" == Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephane> And there is a legal problem first. What do people on Stephane> debian-legal think of the agreement you have to sign: There's exactly one point I would dare to sign

Code copyright in Applied Cryptography (WAS: Re: copyright in one sourcefile of dcd)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "David" == David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 09:43:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote: >> HI folks, >> >> i just took over the dcd package and looked through the files >> for copyright n

Examples for non-freeness (Was: Re: AT&T source licence?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "David" == David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 04:00:21PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >> On Sat 3 March 2000, at 15 h 52, the keyboard of Henning Makholm >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: bzflag license

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Another lesson learned, thanks for all the corrections... (I'm pretty sure I haven't seen all of them). I really should have read the DFSG a *little* more carefully. For anybody who missed it like me, here's the clause that I *thought* makes bzflag n

Re: bzflag license

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There's a clause you seem to have overlooked, that I think makes it non-free (sorry): 3. A reasonable fee may be charged to copy this software. Any fee may be charged to support this software. This software may be distributed as part of