On 2003-06-30 11:44:06 +0200, Baptiste SIMON wrote:
we are in this situation... and I want to prevent changin license by
holder of the copyright. So I'm looking for a solution, giving the
copyright to something, under some terms, etc...
Is there any solution ?
AFAIK No. Under european law
On 2003-05-28 20:21:55 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Bah, there's no copyright in those lists; just like there's no copyright
in the listings of the phone book.
Phone book data _is_ copyrighted in Germany.
Best regards
Martin
--
Our position is that whatever grievances a nation may have,
On 2003-04-16 14:28:44 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I understand the rationale. I'm concerned about the wording. Would the
following violate 5(c)?
% LaTeX-Foobar 1.2.9, copyright 2001--2003 John A. Doe
%
% Please report errors to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
%
% MODIFIED BY Jack Smith
On 2002-10-08 00:02:54 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
The one that holds the trademark on Open Source. Surely you must agree
that that gives their definition special status?
Yes. They were the first to register this TM in the USA.
Best regards
Martin
--
On 2002-10-07 12:47:51 -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Ali Akcaagac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's your definition isn't it ?
No. Read www.opensource.org's definition at point 3:
Which is the definition of a body calling itself Open Source
Initiative.
Open source at first means just
On 2002-10-07 21:09:36 +0100, David Given wrote:
* The owner may put the work into the public domain. This means
that the work's owner is now the state, and the original owner
loses all rights over it. The state automatically grants
This is only possible in some
On 2002-09-08 00:37:59 -0400, Brian Sniffen wrote:
Computer Modern appears to be a trademark of the American Mathematical
Society. I don't know what impact a lack of mention of that in vol
What makes you think that?
Best regards
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de
On 2002-09-08 12:17:44 -0400, Brian Sniffen wrote:
Knuth's own page on CT lists only the trademarks of TeX and MF, so
perhaps the CM trademark has gone unenforced or been dropped.
Since none of the books (and none of the cm files) and no
literatur on TeX mention CM as a trademark, I strongly
On 2002-09-06 18:59:45 -0400, Dylan Thurston wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 03:35:17PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
The names could only be restricted if they are trademarked, which they
are not. Computer Modern might be trademarked (I don't know),
It is, as indicated in the text I
must contain the same metrices and encodings as
Knuth's. You may change the font (i.e. the appearance of the
glpyhs), but the metrices must be Knuth's.
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
the same
character coding schemes and precisely the same font metric
files.
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
On 2002-07-26 15:16:09 -0400, Boris Veytsman wrote:
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2002-07-25 16:46:57 -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
Um, no. In the case where package FOO needs package BAR,
\NeedsTeXFormat has BAR tell FOO that BAR is a good version. Using
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. GhostScript) and doesn't worry about the
PostScript files.
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the first place.
/quote
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200207/msg00199.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200207/msg00140.html
Sorry, but are you trying to start a flame war?
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom
(tex in our case).
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
or right away, according to the absence
or presence of the `\immediate' prefix, as usual for \write. (If
you as a TeX administrator wish to implement more stringent rules
on what can be executed, you will need to modify `tex.ch'.)
/quote
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder
the interchangebilty of our documents higher
than the freedom to modify the components which are used by these
documents.
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
of TeX history);
it is at best very hypothecial.
P.P.S.: The same potential security problems are relevant to
plain.tex, which everyone except Donald Knuth is
forbidden to change. Are you going to stop distributing
that?
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL
On 2002-07-17 10:39:53 -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
I am having trouble finding any file on my system (with tetex-base and
tetex-extra installed) that is licensed in this way. What file did you
pull this license from?
tex.web, which is the source for tex (the binary). Surely you
have the
22 matches
Mail list logo
