Re: legal questions regarding machine learning models

2009-05-27 Thread Mathieu Blondel
ssible to ship a pre-built architecture-independent model together with the data. However this doesn't solve the problem that the data may be too large to be hosted in the archive. -> If data size becomes a problem, then one could resort to use the non-free archive in order to ship the mod

Re: legal questions regarding machine learning models

2009-05-26 Thread Mathieu Blondel
since humans are able to recognize many different voices, shouldn't we have the same goal for speech recognition? Thank you, Mathieu Blondel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: legal questions regarding machine learning models

2009-05-26 Thread Mathieu Blondel
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Francesco Poli wrote: > I think that in the case of machine learning models, source form is > even more clearly distinct from compiled object. > We can consider an artificial neural network, for instance (Mathieu, > correct me if it's a wrong example). > I am unde

legal questions regarding machine learning models

2009-05-26 Thread Mathieu Blondel
the two sides of the coin. Anyway, I think that this kind of legal issue may arise for free software in such fields as speech recognition, handwriting recognition, machine translation, and. all other kinds of applications that make use of machine learning techniques so it's worth discussing it.