I'm going to upload a strobe-less version of netdiag as soon as I find a couple
of minutes to do it. Sorry for the hassle, this copyright notice has been in
there for a long time. But then the copyright might have changed, I need to do
some research.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael a
position expressed by a person that has a
special position but is not elected is to be considered an official
statement by the project?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PRO
annot get rid of this by just stopping
to distribute Java.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
--
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:39:47PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:35:41PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > You are told by a programmer that you are allowed to offer their
> > software on your server, but the programmer also tells you that his
> >
ons, I can't see any realistic scenario in which we could
> be sued and lose a case in relation to this license. Do you?
Yes, I do, but not for distributing it.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:29:05AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 10:50 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Again this logic doesn't seem to work for me. If I was offering warez
> > on my server I couldn't become legal again by just removing it. My
>
c doesn't seem to work for me. If I was offering warez on
my server I couldn't become legal again by just removing it. My prior
action would still get me sued, doesn't it? And no, just saying I
thought it was okay, doesn't help me either.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email
eah I'm a bit pissed of that we only have people criticizing when we
> do great things.
And I'm pissed of that so much seems to happen behind the scenes and I
as a normal developer who did not go to Mexico do not get the info even
if I ask, but instead people are just told to shut up.
w can you help someone if you don't know he needs help?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
bian is no democracy what else is it???
Third we are not talking about "random opinions" but about an opinion
shared by a lot of people. And it still doesn't count? This is not the
project I used to work for for so long.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
with is a bad looking decision done by
just a few people some of whom don't even speak up in this discussion.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Us
nst all other packages? :-)
Again, to all the Sun folks reading this, this is not against your
efforts that I like a lot. But the same PR effect could have been
reached by announcing that Sun and Debian jointly work on a way to
distribute Java instead of pushing it into the archive.
Michael
--
Micha
That's true. But why did they release this license and used no other
wording?
You essantially say, why worry about a license if it's bad PR too sue
the licensees. I doubt it really works that way. After all you could, at
some point somehow, get into a situation where Sun doesn
ences
> > actually examine this one?
>
> Yes.
I take it you were too busy to elaborate on this when you wrote this
email. So you will probably give us the name of this person later on,
right? Or even better this person may stand up now and speak
for himself and share his reasoning.
be the admin who accepted the packages could
tell us why he did and why he did in such a timely fashion. I am
certainly interested in his reasoning.
Michael
P.S.: CCing ftpmaster so this admin definitely gets this email and can
identify himself.
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes do
answer fits with the license. To me the
license seems to give more options for Sun to make us idemnify them.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhei
t the license on Debian legal
which surprises me a little bit, but then maybe I just missed the
relevant parts of the license. Anyway, as a non-lawyer I'm surprised
that we seem to accept that we have to "defend and indemnify Sun".
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Me
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 08:17:56PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> ...
> This prevents modifying and distributing the code for experiments with
> other data formats. Thus non-free.
Thanks a lot for this info.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
U
hanks.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
Hi,
do I need some sort of a special license if I want to package some docs that
are availabe for free on a website?
Michael
P.S.: Please CC me on replies since I'm not subscribed here.
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
Is the appended license okay for us? Yes, I know we are talking about
non-free.
Michael
P.S.: Please CC me on replies.
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz| Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux
21 matches
Mail list logo
