TrueCrypt License 2.3

2008-01-12 Thread Patrick Matthäi
ship it. Here it is: http://www.truecrypt.org/license.php I'm not a lawler, so what do you mean, is this license free or when not could I distribute it in non-free? -- Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.Linux-De

Re: TrueCrypt License 2.3

2008-01-13 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Måns Rullgård schrieb: Patrick Matthäi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello, I wanted to package maybe truecrypt for Debian. There was an older discussion on l.d.legal for an older version of the TrueCrypt license, where the most developers said, that it is not distributeable. But as

Re: TrueCrypt License 2.3

2008-03-30 Thread Patrick Matthäi
ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON

Re: TrueCrypt License 2.5

2008-10-19 Thread Patrick Matthäi
from the source code - if you are allowed to remove it from the source, then do it and it is fine. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Comment: Always if we think we are right, we were maybe wrong. */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Re: deluge and GeoIP database license

2008-11-24 Thread Patrick Matthäi
s considered non-free. I adopted the package and fixed the issues together with the upstream authors. It is fixed since I am repackaging it with a "dfsg" tarball. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Comment: Always if we think

Re: deluge and GeoIP database license

2008-11-25 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cristian Greco schrieb: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:09:45PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >> Yeah it was considered non-free. I adopted the package and fixed the >> issues together with the upstream authors. It is fixed since I

Serious problem with geoip - databases could not be build from source

2009-08-25 Thread Patrick Matthäi
ion of the DFSG, 1) is in my opinion the only acceptable solution for this problem. I hope you could help me. :) - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org Comment: Always if we think we

Re: Serious problem with geoip - databases could not be build from source

2009-08-25 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 MJ Ray schrieb: > Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> GeoIP is a quite usefull library for geolocation. >> It has got a stable ABI/API and upstream is normaly very helpfull with >> patches and issues. > [...] >> Currently

RE: Serious problem with geoip - databases could not be build from source

2009-08-26 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Le mercredi 26 août 2009 à 11:09 +0200, Bjørn Mork a écrit : > You are aware of the GPLv3 licensed database at > http://software77.net/geo-ip/ ? >Woohoo, nice. Combine this with Julien’s idea to implement support for a new >database format, and I think you have the correct solution. And who po

Re: Serious problem with geoip - databases could not be build from source

2009-08-26 Thread Patrick Matthäi
nt. Also someone noted in the thread (I think on devel it was) that the data may be used in limited editions (e.g. only the associated country, but not the contact informations). - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Li

Re: Serious problem with geoip - databases could not be build from source

2009-08-27 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Matthäi schrieb: > Hello lists and maxmind, > > (please CC me in your replys, I am not subscribed to debian-legal@ and > debian-devel@, thanks). I am now, so ignore it. :) . > But I have got a serious problem with it

Re: Bug#550860: ITP: gnaughty -- downloader for adult content

2009-10-14 Thread Patrick Matthäi
n now and my gut feeling is that it's the right > thing to do, given that the code base is free to modify, share and gives > you the usual rights of a free software license (here: GPL2). Please move this whole discussion to debian-legal now. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind rega

Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change

2020-01-03 Thread Patrick Matthäi
, e.g. not main, but non-free, filtering, I have got no idea.. [0]: https://blog.maxmind.com/2019/12/18/significant-changes-to-accessing-and-using-geolite2-databases/ [1]: https://www.maxmind.com/en/geolite2/eula -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux D

Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change

2020-01-03 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Hi, I have added Greg from Maxmind: please forward it if you are not the correct contact for it. Am 03.01.2020 um 18:32 schrieb Florian Weimer: > * Patrick Matthäi: > >> [1]: https://www.maxmind.com/en/geolite2/eula > | 3. Destructions of GeoLite2 Database and GeoLite2 Dat

Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change

2020-01-03 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 04.01.2020 um 01:53 schrieb Faidon Liambotis: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 12:44:49AM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> So if we are not allowed to distribute it anymore we have got the >> following options: >> >> 1) we keep the the current free database in our repos