Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not))

in NEW, but wouldn't be tempted to just install everything that hits NEW by default. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg,GERMANY signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?

n the first place. The alternative world where we stop doing good things because of people like the RIAA seems much worse. Cheers, Phil. [1] https://blog.hansenpartnership.com/lessons-from-the-gnome-patent-troll-incident/ -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| ht

Re: System libraries and the GPLv2

e to ignore the exception to the exception across the board without consulting lawyers? I think there are several people in this thread (myself included) that have demonstrated that they're going to argue against such a consensus. That being the case, it's not going to happen, so repe

Re: OSD && DFSG - a conclusion

At Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:54:43 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > > >>>>> "Philip" == Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Philip> Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I don't want this discussion to drag on

OSD && DFSG - a conclusion

Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't want this discussion to drag on forever, going round and > round, covering the same ground, beating a dead horse, and overusing > cliches and stock phrases. It sure looks like there's sufficient > interest in the idea of evolving the OSD && DFS

graphviz license

I don't know if this has already been looked at, but given their assertion that OSI have failed to get back to them after several months, perhaps we should have a look and tell them what we think of their license. http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/download.html I did have a quick re