forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:16:11 +0200
From: Stefan Heymann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Remco Seesink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Manuals gbak, gfix and gsec
Hi Remco,
I plan to release these documentations under the terms of the
GNU Free Documentation Licence
Hello,
Licening issues resolved! Thanks all.
Cheers,
Remco.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 15:39:00 -0400
From: "Brent Ashley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Remco Seesink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Licening ibwebadmin and JSRS
Th
Hello,
How about this:
Both options don't require you to change anything about the rest of the
software you distribute. The problem is solved if you reply, pick an
option and give permission to use the software and future version under
the license of choice.
First option: Dual licensing under th
>What exactly is this trying to require? I can see several things:
>
>1) You may not change the license on this code. This is a no-op;
> I have no standing to do that.
>
>2) You may not bring legal action to stop others' use of this code.
> For example, you may not sue for patent infringement.
satisfy your
every need.
==
email inquiries: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the e-mail from the author.
From: "Brent Ashley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Remco Seesink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Lutz Brückner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Licening ibwebadmi
Hello,
I am replying to a message from some time ago. This is the original thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00797.html
>On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:09:52AM +0200, Remco Seesink wrote:
>> Copyright:
>>
>> This JSRS stuff was written by me. I find it us
tp://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLIncompatibleLibs
provide a solution?
An alternative solution would be contacting the JSRS to see if he is willing to
relicense it. Am I missing options?
I am not on the list, cc appreciated but I will check the archive.
Cheers,
Remco Seesink.
7 matches
Mail list logo
