by FDL invariant
sections to point at, or do you make this up while you go along?
Now I'll make something up ... suppose I place the following short
chapter under a don't remove this, you may add to it clause:
* Acknowledgements
Robert Bihlmeyer wants to thank Gnomovision for their support
[please cc me]
David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there's an exception for non-topical chapters, then why not for
standards?
Because these are completely different things, see below.
A non-topical chapter is more likely to get out of date than a
standard, which by design is
[cc and reply-to more appropriate list]
Richard Atterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
[doc-html-w3]
That package is in non-free. IIRC the issue is that you can't modify
the standards. Which is somewhat understandable, but still
Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Viral [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like clarify the reason for lame not being included in the debian
archives, not even non-US.
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
IIRC your questions are addressed there.
A few
[cutting down on CCs and CCing debian-legal instead - the thread
should probably continue there]
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
no there is still weak and strong encryption versions of netscape, you
still must go though a click through page stating that you are not
downloading from
Frederik Vanrenterghem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't get the problem. Wasn't this law recently changed, resulting in free
export of encryption software?
AFAIK you still have to jump through some hoops before you can
consider exporting legal. I think it would be a nice thing for the
legal
6 matches
Mail list logo
