Copyright information in new tuxcmd version compat/{crc.pas,md5.pas}

[ please cc me, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel ] Hi Debian-Legal, I'm just on job packaging a new version of tuxcmd. During checking for updating debian/copyright I stumbled over two new files: compat/crc.pas and compat/md5.pas. The source package is be found at the following: http://people.

Re: Copyright information in new tuxcmd version compat/{crc.pas,md5.pas}

Hi Debian-Lega, On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:10:29PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > [ please cc me, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel ] > I'm just on job packaging a new version of tuxcmd. During checking for > updating debian/copyright I stumbled over two new files: &

Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible?

Alexander L. Roshal Files: debian/* Copyright: 2008-2009, Salvatore Bonaccorso License: GPL-2+ License: GPL-2+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 o

Re: Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible?

> [ please cc me, I'm not subscribed to debian-legal ] Hi All Hmm, ... >2. The UnRAR sources may be used in any software to handle RAR > archives without limitations free of charge, but cannot be used > to re-create the RAR compression algorithm, which is proprietary. > Dist

Re: Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible?

Hi! First of all, many thanks for your reply, Frencesco. On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:47:17PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:47:38 +0100 Tomáš Bžatek wrote: > > let me shed some light on source files structure: > > > > ./common/ -- GPLv2+, shared core across several modules

Re: Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible?

Hi I'm forwarding this to Tomas too, since he may not be subscribed to the debian-legal list. Bests Salvatore On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:35:53AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Francesco Poli writes: > > > P.S.: I think that maybe all this mess is not worth doing... maybe the > > best long-term so

scientific paper in package only in postscript form non-free?

Hi debian-legal I'm in the process of preparing a NMU for autoclass [1]. During checking the package I encountered the two postscript files kdd-95.ps and tr-fia-90-12-7-01.ps . Both are awailable from [2]. Can these be shipped in the source and binary package? [1] http://bugs.debian.org/614525

Re: scientific paper in package only in postscript form non-free?

Hi! On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:09:39AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > Salvatore Bonaccorso asked: > > I'm in the process of preparing a NMU for autoclass [1]. During > > checking the package I encountered the two postscript files kdd-95.ps > > and tr-fia-90-12-7-01.ps .

Re: scientific paper in package only in postscript form non-free?

tag 614525 - pending thanks Hi Joerg On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:26:33AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > >> [...] It is doubtful that the PostScript files are > >> the source code referred to by DFSG item 2. More likely is that the > >> source files are TeX documents. > > > Cool, where is the agree