Re: Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses?

Juhapekka Tolvanen schrieb am 06.11.2004 09:10: FSF has this list of Free Software Licenses: http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html Homepage of OSI has this list of OSI-approved licenses: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ But what about Debian-project? Why we do not have a WWW-page

Re: Preferred license for forums content - Part II

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:48:00 Don Armstrong wrote: You really want some sort of tacit assent though. Like a checkbox or simlar that people have to check to indicate that their post is licensed under a specific license.[1] Implicit assent is pretty weak. You also may consider having some sort of

Re: Preferred license for forums content - Part II

Hello Andrew, On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 23:32:17, Andrew Suffield wrote: > It probably isn't legitimate to claim a license in this manner in most > jurisdictions anyway. You normally need an explicit grant from the > copyright holder (while there are some case-law precedents in some > places for ce

Preferred license for forums content - Part II

Hi, some time ago I asked [1] for the prefered license for a debian web forum. Now its time to force the license change for my forum [2] and so I want you to ask again if some plans I made are correct. - Changing license by date I want to change the license for postings which arrive after 01.01

Re: Prefered License for forums content

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, thanks for the suggesstions regarding my "license problems". I´ve read through the licenses you suggested and I personally prefer the MIT license [1]. This license is short, easy to understand (even for "license outsiders" like me :-) ) and i.e. y

Prefered License for forums content

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I run the german speaking website debianforum.de which is I blieve the largest online community for debian support and discussions in Germany. For the postings and the published content I´ve selected the GNU FDL some times ago. Reading debian-dev