that.
Is it a derivative of the code? I doubt it, I see the code as being the
tool that allowed the shooter to generate the image, just as GIMP or a
paint brush would be.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu
| `-'Debian Developer irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy
it no?
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy
| `-'Debian Developer
\_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jqkjho$m1u
, this license is also considered non-free by
the FSF because it conflicts with freedom 0:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy
| `-'Debian Developer
\_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ
to the author, or to sacrifice a goose,
then their would be no problem writing something like:
The Software should be used for Good, not for Evil.
You are encouraged to send a postcard to the Author.
The Author would be pleased if you sacrificed a goose.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan
Jérémy Lal, 2012-01-24 01:55+0100:
I will, and concur. But knowing upstream i can tell he'll need stronger
arguments.
The 3-clause BSD license would seem to be appropriate considering what
the author apparently wants.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net
it
to maintain it under the GPL would seem pretty normal in comparison.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy
| `-'Debian Developer
\_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
to relicense your project until you relicense
it yourself when you see fit. Since, as I said, you are the main author
and the project would be unusable without your code, I think this goal
would be achieved with that mean.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy
of copyright
assignment. But you should be aware that this may discourage some
contributors.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy
| `-'Debian Developer
\_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
or magnetic coding?
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Elessar
| `-'Debian Maintainer
\_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
that would otherwise be a
monopoly of him.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Elessar
| `-'Debian Maintainer
\_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
(Google OS is clearly moving in this direction)
I would like to avoid such fate.
I mostly agree, but I was only replying to what I saw as a misuse of the
desert island test.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Elessar
| `-'Debian Maintainer
the right to do so, only the
software will be pointless in such an environment.
For instance, reportbug is a free tool to use the BTS. It is of no use
on a desert island, but I do not think that makes it non free.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu irc://irc.oftc.net/Elessar
be a shame
if they switched to a buggy license.
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ODbL
Regards,
--
Tanguy Ortolo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of
the original designer that licenced his logo artwork to SPI.
If it cannot, this may be a serious issue, as this Logo with “Debian”,
or derivated work, is used in many packages. For instance, gdm and
gdm-themes are released under GPLv2 but provide images that contain it.
Regards,
--
Tanguy Ortolo
14 matches
Mail list logo
