XBRL XML schema

://www.xbrl.org/legal/ Thanks, wt -- Warren Turkal (w00t) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

sphinx 4

Is the license[1] for sphinx4 DFSG compliant? wt [1] http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net/sphinx4/license.terms -- Warren Turkal Consultant, Penguin Techs http://www.penguintechs.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

sql-ledger may belong in non-free

can tell. Of course, IANAL and may be entirely wrong about some or all of this interpretation. Thanks, wt [1] http://www.sql-ledger.org/cgi-bin/nav.pl?page=misc/terms.htmltitle=Terms%20%26%20Conditions -- Warren Turkal Consultant, Penguin Techs http://www.penguintechs.com

Re: sql-ledger may belong in non-free

On Monday 04 April 2005 04:12 am, Glenn Maynard wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:35:10AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote: If you wish to be copied on replies to Debian lists, please set your Mail-Followup-To header to indicate this, instead of asking everyone else to adjust headers manually

subversion in main?

permission, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am probably just paranoid, but I wanted to know if these are acceptable. BTW, I am not on the mailing list, so please CC replies. Thanks, wt -- Warren Turkal President, GOLUM, Inc. http://www.golum.org

license evaluation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does the following liscense fall under the Debian Social Contract such that it could be distributed in main? If not, how could this package be distributed with Debian? http://www.vovida.com/About/license.html - -- Warren GPG Fingerprint: 30C8

about the vovida license

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If you reply to my message, please CC me as I am not a subscriber to the list. http://www.vovida.com/About/license.html - -- Warren GPG Fingerprint: 30C8 BDF1 B133 14CB 832F 2C5D 99A1 A19F 559D 9E88 GPG Public Key @